YOU Are In Grave Danger!


How Do You Approach New Information, and/or Truth? *

The condition of Protestantism in today's world is deplorable. Most of it has been infiltrated and corrupted by Reformed Calvinism, gross tomfooloery doings like speaking in tongues and getting slain in the spirit, and with endless New Age flavors of the demonic. The Ecumenical direction is toward combining and getting along with all other religions, toward a One-World church and government. That is the wrong direction for churches to be pursueing. The "Coexist" bumper sticker is a pipe dream, an impossible lie.

The result of all this ungodliness is, first, a decline in morality, and second, a decline in our cultures. Everywhere Satan rears his ugly head, his reflection upon us will be devestating when we take our heart, mind and eyes off of God, Jesus, the Holy Spirit and the teachings within the Holy Bible. The outcome of entertaining the so-called pleasures of the flesh outside of biblical boundaries can be nothing but a foray into personal disaster.

Doctrines are formalized expressions of foundational belief. Deception through disinformation is the Doctrine of Demons. Deception is not accidental misinformation, rather, it is deliberate disinformation. Such creeds are pseudo-truths, false alternative explanations, often presented as supposed corrections of the errors of the past.

As will be shown below, one Doctrine of Demons, a hallmark disinformation onslaught of Satan, is the Theory of Uniformatarianism. Another, as will be shown below, is the false, non-biblical, Copernican Cosmology of modern secular pseudo-science. Now, remember, spiritual deception is always based upon "feelings," your flesh over-powering your spirit. "Feelings" will often take one away from obedience to the Word of God to errors of judgment.

The “Judge Not!” admonition is a perfect example:

Most people, when confronted with a religious concept that goes against their habits and thinking, are quick to reply, “Judge not!” and insist that not judging them is the proper Christian response. They quote Matthew 7:1 – “Judge not, that ye be not judged!” as their authority.

The form of judgment that Matthew 7:1 says not to do, is the form of judgment that a person makes when they despise a sinner, while at the same time believing that they are worthy themselves as they continue in the same sins as the despised sinner. Taking the whole passage into account, not just the single verse, makes that more clear. Matthew 7:5 – “Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother’s eye.” Yes, hypocritical judgment of others is remindful of the statement “People who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones.” The emphasis is placed on the word “hypocritical.”

The Bible indicates to boldly correct people in an effort to bring them to repentance. We should not judge hypocritically, or doubtful things that only God can know, or things only by appearance, or things by cherry-picking only one passage or verse, BUT WE ARE INSTRUCTED TO MAKE RIGHTEOUS JUDGMENT ON THINGS THAT ARE MADE CLEAR IN THE BIBLE! The Bible says that we need to judge! We need to read ALL other relevant verses to get a correct overall view of judging as presented in total in the Holy Bible. We must take all relevant verses of the Bible into account to arrive at a full and balanced understanding of the “judging” issue.

Truthfully, we judge all things anyway, all day long, and every day, in everything we do, hear and say. Is the stove top still hot? Is that a song I like? Is so-and-so a person I respect, or not? Is what you just heard true? Should I repeat that? Our judgments are sometimes overly automatic, not well thought out. But since we constantly make judgments, we might as well get the judging done right. Right? Right.

John 7:24 – “Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment.”

Correction, which often brings the “Judge not!” response, is NOT hypocritical judgment, as the Bible says that we should correct, rebuke and be bold to those who are sinning. Rebuking a sinner, exposing corruption, correcting someone IN LOVE or disciplining ones children is not judging wrongfully. People are more likely to take note and remember strong stirring words. Strong words cause people to repent and not remain lukewarm.

Bold ministry can turn people off but they would probably turn away anyway and be considered by God to be lukewarm. Therefore, they probably would also have been rejected by God. In the Bible people mostly either turned well away or became repentant and committed believers, when confronted with the horrors of their sins.

Bold witnessing, and bold preaching, does not mean rudeness or casting personal insults is permissible. It is best to remain emotionally detached in some respects during debate on the internet social media sites. (Yes, personally I realize that I have trouble with that kind of restraint on social media! It is way too easy to have my mouth overload my derriere!) The key is to simply stick to debating the issue at hand with Scripture backup. All rudeness should be avoided. This is called “depersonalizing the conversation.” Be tactful, avoiding the appearance of evil, in all communication.

1 Timothy 5:20 – “Them that sin rebuke before all, that others also may fear.”

Luke 17:3 – “Take heed to yourselves: If thy brother trespass against thee, rebuke him; and if he repent, forgive him.”

2 Timothy 4:2 – “Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all long suffering and doctrine.”

Titus 1:13 – “This witness is true. Wherefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith”

Titus 2:15 – “These things speak, and exhort, and rebuke with all authority. Let no man despise thee.”

Righteous judgment is a very necessary component of the Christian life. We need to become expert in knowledge and understanding of the Holy Scriptures. We need to put on the armor of God, and then let the Holy Spirit lead us in battle against the enemy. When we make ourselves ready, God will use us toward the salvation of others. Our attitude in Judging and in Spiritual Warfare must be as if we are attacking evil and hate, with God’s Perfect Love. We need to be bold like the Apostles in witnessing the Gospel Message, exercising Godly judgment in all things, clearly exposing the differences between Right and Wrong.

From the Zondervan Pictorial Encyclopedia of the Bible, under Judging, I find the following additional information:

“In the OT the word “judgment,” generally in the plural, is sometimes used to designate the Torah–instruction, law–i.e. the sum of God’s testimonies and ordinances (Deut 4:1; Neh 1:7;Ps 119). The central context of the term is in jurisprudence, where a “judgment” is a “judicial decision.” This is the context–the context of justice–in which the words are chiefly employed in the Bible.”

“Back of this, however, and providing the ultimate context of the words, is, on the one hand, the righteousness of God (a blend of justice and love), and, on the other, the moral and spiritual posture and behavior of men and societies residing in a fallen world. In this ethico-judicial context the framework of judging and judgment is the divinely established moral order; the central concepts are those of good and evil, right and wrong; and the operative principle is that what a man sows that he shall also reap (Gal 6:7). The standard of judgment, however, is not the bare law, but the law and the Gospel. What ultimately decides a man’s eternal destiny is his attitude to the Savior Jesus Christ (Rom 8:1). By faith in Him a man is justified and acquited (Rom 3:24-26); by disbelief in or rejection of Him a man remains under the law and is by that law found guilty and condemned (Rom 2:12; Gal 2:16).”

“Not only are judges in human courts of law authorized to make judgments in civil and criminal cases, but all men everywhere are permitted and even obliged to assess human claims upon truth, beauty, or goodness, and to appraise the character, conduct, and teachings both of themselves and of their fellows. This is a fortiori true of Christians (Lev 19:15; Matt 7:15-19; Luke 12:57; John 7: 24; 1 Cor 2:15; 1 Thess 5:21).”

“But judgment that is uninformed, impulsive, superficial, premature, or biased is strictly forbidden in the Bible. Bigotry and censoriousness are emphatically denounced. Christians are urged, when they judge, to do it in a constructive spirit and in accordance with authentic norms. All other judging is contraband, particularly the kind that preempts Christ’s perogative to determine a man’s eternal destiny (Matt 7:1,2; Luke 6:37;Rom 2:1; 14:3,4; 1 Cor 4:5; Col 2:16; Jas 2:4).”

Taking your eyes off the Word of God, listening to "feelings," leads people to another spirit, another Jesus, and another Gospel. Such is the Gnostic heresy. Listening to worldly theologians, without keeping one's eyes on Scripture, can lead to debate of things like the Gnostic concept of Jesus not having a physical body, being an aura instead, who would not leave a footprint in the sand as he walked along the beach. A waste of time and mental energy. A more modern waste of time would be debating how many angels can sit on the head of a pin. When one listens to feelings while taking one's eyes off of the Scripture's, one might need to sit on the other end of that pin, to wake up, and to get their eyes and feelings back to the Gospel message!

The word Pseudo-Science has been loudly attached by secular science to various things that go against their modern no-God and pro-Evolutionary positions. However, when they do that, it is they, the secular scientists, that are practising Pseudo-Science. People that are so decieved can easily go from bad to worse, from a secular college indoctrination to a life engulfed in unrecognized deception, and even to sexual perversions promoted by demon possession and the practice of Satanism. Their seems to be no limit to the extent of deception possible in the phrase "from bad to worse" as a result of swallowing secular science hook, line and sinker. Beware of your initial feelings. Beware of what you fail to test against the revealed Word of God.

* Partially adapted from The Bible Says to Correct, Rebuke & be Bold to Sinners. What is Judging?

It Was Special Creation… Evolution Theory Is A Conspiracy!

Introducing Uniformitarianism

Evolutionary Theory is an offspring of its parent Theory of Uniformitarianism. Evolution has to do with Biology’s gradual building up of simpler life forms to more complicated life forms from an original single cell organism, that in turn was a spontaneous and random formation of original life from inert physical elements.

Uniformitarianism is the doctrine that existing processes, always having acted in the past as they do in the present, are enough to account for all change.

6 Reasons Not to Believe in Evolution

Because random evolutionary events would necessarily require vast ages of time, statistically, literally billions and billions of years are thought to have been necessary for intelligent life to have spontaneously developed in the remote past. Uniformitarianism and Evolution are Pseudo-Sciences, i.e. incorrect and false. Only Intelligent Creation by an intelligent Creator can account for the existence of intelligent life on this earth.

All Uniformitarian Pseudo-Sciences are immersed in conspiracy. Tenured professors teach these false sciences in schools and colleges, because they reject the truths within the Holy Bible and Jesus Christ. That rebellious attitude is the root cause of all conspiracy, by the way. To maintain their position and stature as scientists, they not only teach others their falsehoods, but they also take grant after grant to “prove” their false theories by discovering new types of fossil cave men, and by authenticating this false thing or that false thing. Modern science is the “god” of many ungodly people.

Scientists confirm they have discovered several planets capable of supporting life like on earth that are many light years away. It’s just rubbish. Even if what they were seeing was exactly as they describe, they would be looking at a picture of something that existed light years ago, not at what exists now. So why all the excitement? It is just more scientific foolishness, but they will get more millions of grant money out of it, as they continue to brainwash the gullible with their nonsense.

According to the United States Supreme Court, Modern Humanism is a religion. It is a belief system that excludes God. God is replaced by man. Creation is replaced by evolution. Materialism replaces spirituality. These traits make a Humanist a Secularist. Secularism denies the existence of any deity, claims human reason is supreme, believes in the inevitability of progress, advances science as the ultimate guide, and claims man is inherentlygood and not in need of salvation.


Let’s look at some Pseudo-Science’s that are derived from the Theory of Uniformitarianism:

The first significant notice of Uniformitarianism in modern times was made when James Hutton (1726-1797) presented the theory in 1785 at the University of Endinbourge. Following an attack on the theory in 1793 by Richard Kirwan, Hutton published Theory of the Earth in 1795, in which the doctrine was seriously proposed as a plausible theory for Earth history.

Charles Lyell (1797-1875) adapted the gradual, uniform, “building-up process” theory to the field of Geology with the publication of Principles of Geology in the 1830’s. He disputed Creationism and did not believe in the biblical account of a worldwide flood. In thirty-five years his view was considered respectable. But being respectable does not make a theory positively correct. How can Lyell’s adherents explain layers of undisturbed strata laying horizontally, that contain undisturbed fossilized tree trunks standing vertically, if the strata were laid down over millions of years? They can’t. Whether the universe is 30 billion years old and/or the earth is only 7000 years old is beside the point. The layers of strata were laid down quickly because of a cataclysmic event, the flood of Noah’s time. Otherwise the trees must have fossilized a little at a time starting at their bases and must have kept growing their upper parts over ages of time as the strata was slowly laid down. And what about fossilized human footprints found inside of fossilized dinosaur footprints? Plainly, men and dinosaurs lived together in the past, not millions of years apart as Lyell would have us believe. True science supports the biblical concepts of a past worldwide flood, Creation, and periods of “catastrophe.”

Charles Darwin (1809-1882) adapted Uniformitarianism to the field of biology in the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection in 1859, and then to mankind in Descent of Man. Darwin reorganized biology so that it complimented Lyell’s reorganization of geology. By using Lamarks’ (1744- 1829) proposition of the inheritance of acquired characteristics, and Lyell’s millions of years of gradual change time scale so that they complimented his own observations of worldwide flora and fauna, he extended the coverage of Uniformitarianism from the non-living to the living, and to man.

Observation demonstrates Darwin’s error. For example, how many new “species” have appeared or “evolved” in the last century as compared to “species” that have become extinct? The answer is obvious. The only change that a Genesis “kind” is capable of, is the variance allowed by the total gene pool of the “kind.” “Mutations” are only genetically aberrant individuals within a species. A dog will always be a dog, no matter how it is selectively bred. Extinction alone proves things are going downward, not upward.


Uniformitarian Social Orders & Politics

Karl Marx (1818-1883) adapted the theory of Uniformitarianism, and the Darwin inspired notion of the “survival of the fittest,” to his theory of “class warfare.” This is the theory of Dialectical and Historical Materialism (the logic of conflict dealing with only the material things of this world), wherein one society (the thesis) clashes with another society (the anti-thesis), and results in the formation of a third and “better” (the “building-up” process) society (the synthesis). Problem. Reaction, Solution! See: The Dialectic. Control the Thesis and Antithesis, and you can control the Synthesis, and that is how public perception is gradually changed by governments. It is indoctrination and brainwashing. Supposedly Communism would clash with Capitalism, and the result would be the perfect Socialist state. The average American now expects a “new secular order,” or “New World Order,” to appear through the efforts of the United Nations or a United Europe, not realizing that it is only another socialist and totalitarian scheme. Even Christians expect the New World Order to appear soon, courtesy of Ecumenical misinterpretation and misapplication of Scripture.

In practice, such socialistic things as a “common purse” or “holding all things in common” can only work successfully among very small units of people, usually among only a few families. As a positive force in society Socialism is a failure. When people are not allowed personal ownership and reward for their labors, individual initiative disappears. If everyone is to receive an equal share from the common store, why would anyone want to work harder or produce more than his neighbor?

Thanksgiving: Overcoming Socialism

Socialism was tried in America at Plymouth. It produced indolence, welfare-prone laziness, unwillingness to work, lack of incentive, and hopelessness. The colony would have starved if it were not for the friendly Indians who showed them how to plant American corn. Only when Governor Bradford divided up the land and left each family to shift for itself or suffer want, did the situation improve. In the end, with the hope and promise of possible abundance being produced under a free-enterprise system, prosperity prevailed. Free- enterprise then became the driving force of America.

Even Bolshevism Was Financed From Wall Street

For years Soviet Russia failed to feed itself while America prospered under the free-enterprise system. But our free- enterprise system is turning into another form of socialism. Today, in America, people want too much “for free” from big government. Nothing is free. Not socialized medicine, or anything else that government can provide. Many of these ills of our society would be better solved on the state and local level, and by the churches, rather than by federal government. Local control allows citizens greater influence on policies, and lowers the amount of graft and waste that the Federal government has become famous for. But then, that would necessitate the citizenry participating in government, and would require church attendance and financial support.

Consider The Capitalist Conspiracy

Though the United States Constitution is not etched in stone and allows Amendments, it is a fact that our Federal Government has clearly overstepped its authority, nullified many traditional American concepts, and has become a burden to the people through graft, the thievery of heavy taxation, and the stupid accumulation of massive debt. America now practices Corporate Socialism (also called State Capitalism). Our original Constitutional Republic government is being legislated out of existence.

Nikolai Lenin (1870-1924) put Marx’s theory into ruthless militant application in Communist Russian society, and murdered millions of individual’s at home and abroad.

Soviet Russia fell from a coup, but Germany’s people turned their backs on God! Their scientific advances failed to prepare them for the barbarity that followed. America is precisely following the same path as early Nazi Germany. If the current trend continues, the judgment of God will surely bring punishment or destruction to America!

Adolf Hitler (1889-1945), an early “New Age” advocate, developed Marx’s theory into a racial philosophy that cost millions more people their lives. The German people failed to practice what they professed to believe, and paid a very heavy price for their laxness. For all practical purposes, they accepted Humanism. Even the German citizen’s were reduced to “biological entities” that were “expendable.” It became easy for the people to blame “the Jews” for all of societies problems.

Nazism (National Socialism) was and is only another form of socialism. Socialist leaders are still endlessly coming to power due to the ignorance, lethargy, and the gullibility of the people, abroad and at home. In America, the average citizen can’t even describe what a socialist really is, anymore.

As just outlined, the Pseudo-Sciences (FALSE Sciences!) are all based on the false Theory of Uniformitarianism that says existing processes, always having acted in the past as they do in the present, are enough to account for all change. And the “scientific” and “political” baloney rampant is the United States today is a direct result of that incorrect information and deliberate propaganda. Historical gradual change is attributed to Geology, Biology (Evolution), the Social Sciences, Education and a host of other fields. And so-called “gradual change” is now forced upon us trough the use of Hegelian Dialectical Method, and crowd-control brainwashing.

Psychological Mumbo-Jumbo

God, and Truth, cannot be changed by secular humanist “scientific” thinking and modern psychological theory. It matters not that various ignorant so-called “scientists” have a dream of what they think ought to be. Genuine science can disprove many of these theories. They can be debunked!

The Sermon That Derailed American Christianity

Modern psychology throws God out as a reality, and recognizes Him as only a superstitious concept. In fact, it should be recognized that most famous researchers who have developed such theories are religiously secular. Yes, that is a contradiction of terms. It is not logical! So their basis of “thinking” is exposed as flawed right from the start. They only dream, and imagine vain things, and seek to manipulate people, as they rebel against God. Such “learned” individuals stupidly puff themselves up in self-righteous false pride.

In 1779, Franz Anton Mesmer (1734-1815) announced his belief that he had found the great universal cure of both physical and emotional problems. His idea was of an invisible fluid throughout the body called “animal magnetism,” that influenced the mental, emotional, and physical aspects of life. Since Mesmer’s day, treatment by passing magnets over the body have been discontinued, and has progressed to the belief in “mind over matter.” Mesmerism now involves trance- like states of hypnoses, telepathy, precognition, and clairvoyance. This is the foundation of the popular “positive thinking” fanatics.

In 1913, John Watson (1878-1958) wrote Psychology As The Behaviorist Views It, defining Behaviorism, an extension of animal psychology based upon Uniformitarianism. He included Mesmerism’s ideas of hypnotic suggestion (hypnosis), healing through talking (psychotherapy), and mind-over-matter (positive thinking). Behaviorism contends that mankind, the individual, begins life as a “clean slate,” just a whole living organism reacting to his environment. No mind, soul, instincts, native intelligence, special talents, inherited gifts, and no innate emotions are believed to be evident. In other words, according to Behaviorism, man is simply a stimulus-response machine, and his system of behavior is thus built up by the process of conditioning.

Sigmund Freud (1856-1939) and several other psychologists have invented other forms of psychology that are variants of atheistic Behaviorism. Freudian psychology says, for all practical purposes, that with a good analyst we can lay the blame for our personal problems on anything other than ourselves! Sigmund Freud and Carl Jung (1875-1961) damaged confidence in Christianity by directly contradicting the Word of God. Freud considered religious beliefs to be illusions and called religion “the obsessional neurosis of humanity.” Jung considered religion to be myth, yet good, because religion could affect human personality. Freud and Jung did not deal in science, but rather in values, attitudes and behaviors. Freud simply “justified” his own idiosyncrasies and sexual sin. Freud’s morals were lower than the gutter, as can be observed per his statements. The ideas of sexual pervert Freud, considered to be the Father of the Psychotherapy Movement, saturate later theories and therapies.

Why Sigmund Freud is BAD

“Patients are nothing but riff-raff. The only useful purposes they serve are to help us earn a living and to provide learning material. In any case, we cannot help them.” – Sigmund Freud

Psychiatrists and pharmaceutical companies would prefer you didn’t know or have easy access to information about the crippling and even lethal effects of psychotropic drugs. The complex medical jargon used to describe the drugs and their “adverse effects” can often put consumers off from even looking.

While billions of tax dollars are paid each year to fight the “War on Drugs,” psychiatrists are dreaming up new mental illnesses to fund a multi-billion dollarlegal drug industry.

The direct result is a fast escalating, worldwide consumption of their addictive, mind-altering drugs. Sometimes with adverse side effects! They would like you to believe that there is an epidemic of mental disease—and that mind-altering drugs are the cure. They market to the public that their drugs are indispensable to the problems of everyday living. Yet, psychiatrists admit they do not know the cause of, or cure for, any mental disorder. In actuality, demon influence and possession account for most of the people who are locked up in mental institutions.

In fact, there is a complete absence of scientific tests to confirm a psychiatric diagnosis. In a recent study, scientists have revealed that there is no connection between schizophrenia and the genes most commonly believed to cause the condition. There is however, an exhaustive list of statistics related to pscyhotropic drug side effects and even deaths.

The biggest drug-addiction problem in the world doesn’t involve heroin, cocaine or marijuana. In fact, it doesn’t involve an illegal drug at all. The world’s biggest drug-addiction problem is posed by a group of drugs, the benzodiazepines, which are widely prescribed by doctors and taken by countless millions of perfectly ordinary people around the world. For example, in the period between 1990 – 1996, benzodiazepines caused 1,810 deaths in Britain, making them more lethal than heroin, cocaine and methadone, which combined accounted for 1,623 deaths. In 2001, a British study reported an ‘increase in hostility and aggression may be reported by patients taking benzodiazepines.

The effects range from talkativeness and excitement to aggressive and antisocial acts.’ Professor C. Heather Ashton reported cases of baby-battering, wife-beating and ‘grandmother-bashing’ could be attributed to people taking benzodiazepines.” Drug abuse is a known gateway to demonic manifestations and infestations.

Ivan Pavlov (1849-1936), who conditioned dogs, later researched his stimulus-response techniques on unwilling soviet citizens with Bektorev. This was by direction of Lenin, with an eye toward developing methods of crowd control, and an underlying intention of robbing religion of as much credit as possible, and with the ultimate aim of destroying religion completely. Conditioning is a method of learning by which a specific response is continuously given to a specific stimulus until it is learned. It becomes a conditioned reflex or response. The specific stimulus, which can be controlled, can be words, phrases, facial expressions and so on, which through the conditioning process will eventually elicit the specific response, reaction, or behavior.

Pavlov’s stimulus-response model of reaction, the “reflex arc,” was the foundation for the “operant conditioning” of B. F. Skinner (1904-1990). Skinner took it a step further, putting emphasis on behavior modification. His theory was rooted in evolutionary biology, and not simply mechanical. Skinner said the environment stimulates behavior, and reinforces behavior.

Skinner expanded the Pavlovian stimulus-response model with the stimulus-behavior-reinforcement model. Leaving the simple mechanical response, he specifically contended that responses have evolutionary biological consequences in man, or “survival value,” meaning survival of the fittest. Thus, the behavioral response which is successful or rewarding to the individual is strengthened over time (positive reinforcement), and behavior that is not successful or rewarding is eliminated or abandoned over time (negative reinforcement). The environment becomes the source of the stimulus and the reinforcement.

Behavioral engineering is based on Skinnerian circular reasoning, and is rather pointless, as it leaves out God, which is the way out of the loop. But it goes like this: For State controlled man, human freedom is an illusion, and when indulged in often leaves the unsuspecting man prey to many forces; the “liberal” concept of individual freedom actually sacrifices freedom–men cannot control forces of which men are unaware or unsuspecting; “liberalism’s” historical task of freeing man from “traditionally repressive agencies” like the state, church, and family does not really gain men freedom–it just leaves control open to others, perhaps the salesman, a demagogue, a cheat, or a bully. Skinner is saying that man (in the form of the State) must control man, as usual, and that control through behavioral engineering, by operant conditioning, is desirable after all. So the “state” wins, and he is back where he started. It sounds like the highbrow double-talk that it is, because the Church and Family are still left out, as in all standard secular theories.

Skinner is criticized by many people because his methods violate “free will.” Skinner contends, however, that our behavior is controlled haphazardly by our environment–by advertising, teachers, parents, etc.. Skinner contends that by being aware of this conditioning, we can then control our environment. In truth, conditioning could be and sometimes is used beneficially, but one must recognize its limits and abuses. Traditional humanistically based psychodynamic theories contradict Christian teaching, in that a Christian knows man cannot “do it” himself. Strategies for personal change must agree with scriptural patterns for achieving inner peace and wholeness, or they will fail. Man is not the means of his own salvation. And the average man or woman has no control over use of conditioning methods used by secular corporations and governments with massive amounts of money to spend in convincing people of their viewpoint.

Conditioning is, in the hands of unscrupulous individuals, organizations, cults and governments, a method of brainwashing and crowd control. It suppresses free expression and is antagonistic to the basic American enjoyment of unalienable rights. Conditioning is used to train people. Capitalist methods of mass advertising, brainwashing and propaganda, are also examples of conditioning. They can lead the unwary to spiritual death.

Carl Rogers (1902-1987) developed client-centered therapy, claiming each person is striving toward self- actualization. He stressed warmth and acceptance by others, a support group, and acceptance of one’s-self as the way one can “cure” himself.


Abraham Maslow (1908-1970) also assumed man to be innately good, and defined a hierarchy of needs that the individual must attain to reach self-actualization. The “needs” of hunger, thirst, sex, and security had to be attained before the “higher” needs of love, esteem, and self-actualization. When I took psychology in college, Maslow and Skinner were the teacher’s favorites. Later when taking a business class I pointed out that Maslow’s Pyramid is upside down. In other words, getting right with God, real self-actualization should precede satisfying all the other needs. Yes, I know, I can be a bit of a trouble maker in secular situations. (Note that Maslow didn’t include the Transcendence level to the Pyramid. That is a later New Age addition.)

Christians recognize that reconciliation to God and relationship with God are only possible through Jesus Christ. Humanism recognizes only man’s reconciliation to man being all up to man. In truth, our eternal destiny is dependent on our reconciliation and relationship with God, and that is the only means of attaining our full potential of wholeness, maturity, and fruitfulness. 1


Educational Hocus-Pocus

John Dewey (1859-1952) applied Uniformatarianism to public education, and believed that mankind had reached the point in its evolution that mankind could control its own evolution.

“The master idea… was that of evolution… Independently of the writings of both Compte and Spencer, there proceeded during the 19th Century, under the influence of the evolutionary concept, a thoroughgoing transformation of older studies like History, Law and Political Economy’; and the creation of new ones like Anthropology, Social Psychology, Comparative Religion, Criminology, Social Geography.” 2

By 1905, Dewey was the dominant voice in American teacher educational change, operating out of Harvard University. In 1920, Russia hired John Dewey to construct a program of “progressive education” for the Soviet school system. By 1932 Russia informed Dewey that he was a failure, and that rather than educating the children, his system was turning out a nation of delinquents. In 1933, after failing in the Soviet Union, Dewey set up the same Humanistic system in the United States.

“Dewey changed the aim, content, and methods of education. It is important to understand why and how he changed the aim of our schools. He was a National Socialist, promoting one hundred percent state control or ownership of property, all means of production, whether capital, natural resources, or labor. He called it collectivism. In 1905 he organized the Intercollegiate Socialist Society, along with Jack London, Upton Sinclair, Walter Lippmann, and W.E.B. Dubois. In 1921, the Society changed its name to the League for Industrial Democracy., and Dewey served as its president in 1941. It’s aim was to put teachers in the classroom who were collectivists, as well as ministers in the pulpits and leaders in the labor unions. In 1962, the League formed an action arm called the Students for a Democratic Society.

Early in the century Dewey had formed the Progressive Education Association and the American Association of University Professors. These two organizations were committed to the goal of collectivizing the United States.

By the 1930’s the political climate was suitable for their work, and social studies departments were formed in public schools in several important local systems in the United States. By the forties, social studies had moved into the elementary schools.

Having changed the aim of the schools, the content of education also underwent great changes. New textbooks were written and the old ones revised to present the collectivist aim…

During and immediately following World War II, the emphasis on creating a new economic and social order in this country was expanded to include the entire globe…The global government would remove the sovereignty of all countries…

In 1955, the Progressive Education Association disbanded…It had been so persuasive, however, that it has continued to be dominant over traditional education in the classroom and its philosophy, in fact, is in control of American education…It is a concept of man which rejects nearly every previously held belief about man and his nature.” 3

Systematic application of student psychological control by utilizing evolutionary concepts and methods (behavioral engineering, values education, reality therapy, etc.) are now standard procedure in American education, and are devastating the lives of our children. Behavioristic mind- control is atheistic, un-American, and since it is a Humanist belief it is actively and militantly ant-Christian. It is corrupt. It is dangerous.

The men who designed our Constitution understood the necessity of establishing laws to protect our individual freedoms. The Northwest Ordinance of 1785 said, “Religion, morality and knowledge being necessary to good government and the happiness of mankind, schools and the means of education shall be forever encouraged.” So, first religion, secondly morality, and thirdly knowledge, were the original ingredients of character that built our great country.

Horace Mann (1796-1859) changed these ingredients of success, in the mid-1800’s, to “Intellectual, Moral, and Physical.” The spiritual was dropped and the physical was added.

Today, through the efforts of Behavioristic educators, the ingredients are “Cognitive, Affective, and Psychomotor.” Cognitive emphasizes the individual learning of facts, as opposed to handing down a body of knowledge from another generation. Psychomotor has to do with physical skills such as writing and typing. Affective has to do with feelings, and takes the place of and stands in opposition to Morality.

Morality has to do with giving attention to duty, duties going hand-in-hand with unalienable rights. A moral person takes care of “ought-to’s” ahead of personal desires, and exhibits honesty, good work habits, and concern for others placed ahead of one’s own feelings. In contrast, Affective promotes the idea that how you feel inside, what you want, is the prime consideration. Affective sets the individual ahead of his neighbor, effecting a self-centered selfish view of life and the world. 4

How sad it is that we constantly hear of legal battles over the right to pray or possess a Bible in the school systems. When God is eliminated from the considerations of men, false theories abound, and society begins to crumble. All these evils are intertwined, part and parcel of Uniformitarian secular thinking. Parents allow false teaching in the public schools, and then wonder why their children are involved in mischief and trouble.

“The master idea…was that of evolution…Independently of the writings of both Compte and Spencer, there proceeded during the 19th Century, under the influence of the evolutionary concept, a thoroughgoing transformation of older studies like History, Law and Political Economy; and the creation of new ones like Anthropology, Social Psychology, Comparative Religion, Criminology, Social Geography.” 5

Traditional Bible-based Puritanism, a result of the Reformation, presupposing such things as absolutes and still intact in 1900, has given way to Secularism as a result of the Enlightenment.

Today we have a world where “values” and “values clarification” educational methods are corrupting our children. Values clarification, a behavior modification technique, teaches the child that the parents are trying to pass on biased information, that the child should ignore such biased information, that the child should then choose his or her own “values” based upon affective concepts (Pragmatism – “If it feels good, do it!), and that then the child should “prize” and “cherish” these new values and put them into habitual action in their lives. Obedience to parents or church is ridiculed and rebellion is glorified. Many children who have been taught this garbage are now parents, ignorant of proper child rearing techniques, lost and unhappy themselves, and totally unable to provide proper guidance and direction to their progeny.

“While the youngest mind is taught that their are no absolutes, that no decision is final; that no authority figure except the State has the last word; that everything is equally acceptable; that real objectivity is the absence of any standard of right and wrong; then I contend that these young minds will be learning the ruthlessness which is so prevalent in today’s youth and being acted out on all sides in today’s society…In the Educationists’ terminology, the logical consequences of this philosophy, real freedom is achieved only when one is a slave to the state. It is worth mentioning here that democracy is not seen by the educationist as a form of government, but a way of life. It is in reality a socialized society…There is something vastly more sinister to be pointed out here than just production of the group mentality. The implication of such a group mind is that the person goes on through life looking to the group to validate all of his decisions. The corollary of this insistence on relating everything to the group, relating from smaller to larger groups, and taking the largest group decision as the ultimate, is that the family is downgraded to just another small group with no special meaning. Thus, all family decisions, especially in the area of values, are open at all times to modification through group dynamics in the classroom, and eventually become of little importance at all to the child.” 6

Today our corrupted educators look forward to a man-made utopia where all people will think the same, within the framework of a one-world government. This mental state is called Eupsychia. B. F. Skinner really teaches that man is simply a machine with no dignity that should be controlled by the state. One world–one mind. These people are members of what is called the Third Force, or the Third Wave.

LGBT's Secret Weapon: Values Clarification

“Values Clarification indoctrinates students in ethical relativism, for its proponents push their own position on their captive student audiences and never suggest that thoughtful people may choose alternatives. Sidney Simon, Howard Kirschenbaum and other Values Clarification authors repeatedly belittle teachers of traditional values.

Values Clarification strategies “emphatically indoctrinates, by encouraging and even exhorting the student to narcissistic self-gratification." Using Situational Ethics, and Immoral Reasoning Skills. Parents did not react immediately. But when children began to report over dinner that class discussion had been about whether lying was sometimes permissible and whether they should always obey their parents Values... [attentive parents became upset.]

The use of Values Clarification in public schools or even by such quasi-public agencies as Planned Parenthood constitutes a direct violation of First Amendment protection against the establishment of religion.

Values Clarification, Situational Ethics, Decision Making Skills, Problem Solving Skills, Critical Thinking Skills, Higher Order Thinking Skills, Creative Thinking Skills, Values Appraisals, Conflict Resolution Skills are all names of programs that teach children there are no moral absolutes! Many of these programs were originally developed by the likes of Carl Rogers, Abraham Maslow, William Coulson, Sidney Simon, Lawrence Kolberg, William Glasser, etc. These programs infiltrate the schools and education through out the country. These programs can be found at times in any course at any grade level. They are most often in guidance counseling lessons, Peer Conflict Resolution programming, Health class and Family Consumer Education courses. Parents should ask for and view all material.

I posed the following question to a couple of teachers in the West Allis School District: “How is it that when schools and teachers are using values clarification, situational ethics in the classroom there are no right or wrong answers in the manuals”? The Teachers responded “Well do you want to impose your moral values on everyone else”? Knowing that it was politically incorrect to answer yes, (even though I would like to) , knowing that this was a political entrapment question to accuse me of the idea of who do you think you are, I responded “No. I don’t need to do that, but on the other hand it is not the teacher’s right, or the educational establishment’s right to teach my children that moral right and wrong is a matter of opinion all in the eye of the beholder. You are undermining my position in the home, as the parent, my authority, and responsibility, and my love for my children.”

The one thing which is common in all of these programs is that when viewing papers or manuals with worksheets filled with questions that challenge children’s beliefs and values, one will never find any right or wrong answers to the moral dilemmas. This is a form of brainwashing. The children are to decide what is best for themselves or the group.

Children are ill prepared to handle Values Clarification for the following reasons:

     1. It always pits one value or belief against another.
     2. It always locks children into a box of choices, giving children the illusion, they are making their own decisions.
     3. It propagates that there are not any moral absolutes.
     4. It teaches that children have a right to determine what is right and wrong based on how they feel independent of their parents.
     5. It sets up X number of parents for a fall, where the child comes home one day, and states you do not have a right to tell me what to do, I can make my own decisions.
     6. It propagates as in multiculturalism that all beliefs are equal.
     7. It promotes group think mentality that values and beliefs can be decided by the group not on the idea there is a moral absolute.
     8. Parents are finding their children to be more defiant, and obstinate than ever before.
     9. At it’s core, it tears down traditional values, and undermines religious freedom and the family.” 1


A Conclusion To This Deception

The Theory of Uniformitarianism is perhaps the most foundational and completely corrupt piece of so-called science to ever have been dreamed up. It is truly satanic in nature, spawned by demonic influences or Satan himself. Pseudo-Science is an affront to God, the equivalent of giving the bird to Jesus himself.

The false educations being thrust upon our youth is ruining our kids and our country, literally. The kids believing this garbage will end up shaping and running things ignorantly. Some already are, those little darlings of the 60’s and Berkeley who were submerged in Socialism. Conspiratorial Socialists are now everywhere in government and among the citizenry. It is imperative that we who know the truth, who still try to live according to New Testament morality and Constitutional Law, teach our youth what the real nature of the Creation and Republic is! It is also imperative that we know and teach what Socialist and Communist propaganda and Psychopolitics actually is. Lacking this knowledge the Republic is doomed.


1. Florence Bulle (1983), God Wants You Rich And Other Enticing Doctrines, p. 191, Bethany House Publishers, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55438.

2. Victor Ranford, “Sociology,” Encyclopedia Brittanica, Vol. 20 (1949), p.59, Crossway books, Good News Publishers, Winchester, Illinois.

3. Estalvin Dee Lillywhite (1985), Secrets That Every American Should Know, pp. 159-160, Hawkes Press; E. Dee Lillywhite, 2523 East Lambourne (3150 South), Salt Lake City, Utah 84109; Phone: 1-801-484-1871.

4. Jean Stayton, The Call to Christian Education in Our Time, p. 4, Hope Day School, 2425 1/2 South Chrysler, Independence, Missouri.

5. Victor Ranford, “Sociology,” Encyclopedia Britannica, Vol. 20 (1949), p. 912; cited by John W. Whitehead (1986), The End Of Man, p. 59, Crossway Books, Good News Publishers, Winchester, IL 60153.

6. Estalvin Dee Lillywhite (1985), Secrets That Every American Should Know, pp. 193-194, Hawkes Press; E. Dee Lillywhite, 2523 East Lambourne (3150 South), Salt Lake City, Utah 84109; Phone: 1-801-484-1871.


Yes! The Earth IS Flat!

Well, pretty much so. The mountains rise and fall, but their is no planetary curve at all. Water remains level, stirred only by the intervention of the natural phenomena, animals and mankind.

The earth is stationary and its surface is flat rather than curved. It requires neither science nor religion to prove that this is so. It only requires common sense and some mental visualization. What you've been told, that the earth is a globe, is a lie, and there is ample evidence to prove that statement. But first let's examine what the Bible says.

Now the part that requires neither science nor religion to prove the earth is flat: Visualize the sun traveling through space. Visualize a ball earth corkscrewing through space around the sun as both the sun and earth hurtle along through outer space. Place yourself on that ball earth looking into space. Imagine what the star patterns observed from that earth would look like. You would never see the same pattern of stars twice, because you are never going to be in the same place in space more than once. Constellations would change with each passing minute, never to appear the same again, as your vantage point changed. Only on an immovable and stationary earth with the sun, moon and stars repeatedly circling above in stable paths can we see the same North Star century after century, and observe constellations patterns that remain the same.

Visualize it! Visualize the sky view standing on a ball earth flying through space. Then visualize the sky view on a stable, immovable, flat earth with a circling star pattern above us. And then you will know beyond any doubt that the earth is "flat" and not a round "planet" at all. Our flat earth is actually contained within a "snow globe" configuration, the earth and seas flat within a domed, steel-hard and impenetrable, glass-like firmament.

Recognizing this one greatest lie about our earth and existence, exposing the false Copernican Theory, should open your eyes to the possibility of many other lies about reality that we are constantly taught, and brainwashed with.

After using this common sense mental visualization, you should be comprehending the "flat earth" truth! Perhaps it is time to take another look at the Holy Bible, which is a "flat earth" book. If you haven't read it, maybe you should. Maybe, just maybe, the Bible story of Jesus Christ and the Gospel Message is true! It is my witness that the Bible IS absolutely true! And "...The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork." - Psalms 19:1


Ecology, Warming, Cooling & Nuclear Contamination Of Earth

Consider the insanity of nuclear research involving the explosions of hundreds and hundreds of nuclear bombs, and the catastrophe's of Chernobyl and Fukushima! How much death and destruction linger ever present from all the tests around the world, and from all the expended munitions laced with radiation? How many accidentally genetically modified freaks of nature do we want for children? Our oceans and our air are being poisoned with radiation, and we wonder why we have escalating cancer rates? We should not wonder at all.

The main reason the flat earth reality is rejected by the powers-that-be is because if one believes in a flat earth, then one would logically need to take a second look at what the Word of God within the Holy Bible says about Creation. Modern Pseudo-Science pushes Uniformitarianism and its child fantasies of, to mention just three, Evolution, Socialism and Modern Psychology.

The ugly and unholy conspiracy against God is exposed by the Flat Earth Cosmology for what it really is: A conspiracy so vast that it boggles the mind! The secular world will always try to minimize or eradicate belief in Jesus Christ and the Message of Salvation. Occult followers of Satan and the Mysteries, haughty and rebellious, will always try to change words, definitions, and then say everything is the opposite of what it says in God's Word. Copernicus was wrong, and the Bible is true, and thus we can know with assurance that the earth is indeed "snow globe flat" and covered by a firmament dome, and that God's throne is at the top where He can look down over the whole earth. Sin is rampant and the forces of evil are trying to destroy earth and mankind. Weapons of war, like bad religion, bad theology and Pseudo-Science, are among the tools used by the many satanic forces of evil.


The Earth: Creation's Real Cosmology

From the surface of the earth to the highest part of the dome firmament is believed by many to be over three thousand miles. Going horizontally in any direction away from the North Pole will take one eventually to the edge of Antarctica which encloses the oceans and continents of the earth. Once on Antarctica it is two or three thousand miles, and maybe farther, to the bottom edge of the dome firmament where it touches the surface of the earth. Stars are lights within the firmament, and the firmament holds up the waters above from crashing down to the earth. The sun and moon are lights that go in and out of the firmament and they travel on slightly different circular paths above the surface of the earth depending on the season. Thus there are no globe planets or stars beyond the dome, nor is there any so-called outer space, that we know of. What is beyond the waters above or the waters below is only known to God and the angels. If the created earth is round in any sense, it is round as pictured above, like a snow globe enclosed environment, with the surface of the earth being a level plane.

The word planet is itself based on the root word plane, which is defined with the attributes of a level surface devoid of curve, and usually also positioned horizontally. In the 120 mile length of the Suez Canal there should be a drop of almost 7,300 feet, or about 1.4 miles, from one end to the other if the earth is the globe that modern Pseudo-Science says it is. But there is no drop! The Suez Canal is flat and level from one end to the other.

Speaking of water being flat upon the earth brings up the subject of gravity. There is no such thing as gravity.

There is no such thing as gravity, holding water to the surface of a globe, because water will not do that. There is only density of matter, which makes lighter things like smoke rise upward through the air, and heavier things like water sink downward through the air. (Water and air are extremely similar in composition, and can be likened to two different forms of oceans.) Most rocks are denser than air and water, and sink downward through both air and water. Lighter than air gases like Helium, lighter than the atmosphere at ground level, rise upward, and when enclosed within a blimp raise Blimp's upward. Submarines are designed to rise up and sink down in water, by manipulating its mass and total density.

Common sense examination of many things prove that the earth is flat, as the next graphic shows. Reality is different than the powers-that-be want you to think.


The Heavens: Creation's Real Cosmology

All lies require constant attention, and the addition of new lies to affirm the supposed correctness of the previous lies. NASA is one of those liars telling lies, and in fact NASA is the one telling the biggest whoppers! "Outer Space" is their specialty, and so is the diversion of billions of taxpayer dollars into dosinformation projects and, presumably, into black ops.

Following are two scans from my 1962 set of The American Peoples Encyclopedia set, from Vol. 1 just inside the front cover. When studied, they are very revealing.

I notice first the lineup of elements found in the Stratosphere, Thermosphere and Exosphere, which are listed toward the left edge. Someone could do a beneficial scientific study of buoyancy and density as opposed to the theory of gravity covering those atmospheric elements. Secondly I notice the sliver of globe at the bottom of the graphic. One of the first things children see at school is a globe. It's politely called indoctrination, and not so politely called brainwashing. And once learned, the lie is hard to unlearn!

The second graphic shows that at about 1,000 miles altitude the radiation count is about 14,500 counts per second. I've seen estimates of the firmament dome being over 3,000 miles high, and I suppose that radiation count would only go higher and higher. The radiation level would certainly become increasingly lethal to human life at the higher altitudes!

CPM (counts per minute) is a measure of radioactivity, a unit of measurement for a Geiger counter. 120 CPM on the meter (for Cs137) is about 1 uSv/hr (microSievert per hour).

The average annual U.S. radiation dose is equivalent to 6 milliSieverts (6 mSv).

The radiation dose for increased cancer risk of 1 in a 1,000 is 12.5 milliSievert (mSv). The earliest onset of radiation sickness is at 750 milliSievert (mSv). The onset of radiation poisoning is at 3,000 milliSievert (mSv). An expected 50% death rate from radiation exposure is at 4,000 milliSievert (mSv).

14,500 CPS x 60 seconds = 870,000 CPM. 870,000 CPM ÷ 1,200 CPM = 10 uSv/hr (microSievert per hour).

At 10 uSv/hr (microSievert per hour), radiation sickness would begin in 300 hours, which is in 12.5 days. Radiation poisoning would occur at 400 hours, which is in 16.66... days.

What does this say about trips to the moon and space stations? Figure it out.

This second graphic also shows the temperature rising to 3000 degrees at an approximate height of 1000 miles high. I've seen estimates of the dome being about 3,000 miles high? The Pioneer II "Lunar Probe" blew up at about 1,000 miles: hint, hint!

NASA has a habit of telling on itself, as all liars usually do. These scans from my Encyclopedia drive that point home.

From Scientist, Explorer & Author Michael Tellinger:

“After many months of research I still cannot find any scientifically accepted proof of a physical nature, that the Earth is moving through space – and that it actually is a ball. Everything I held dear and as an unshakable truth has been shaken to its core and stripped of all credibility. It is more clear than ever before that everything we have been told is a lie, and the most important teachings have been strategically omitted by our education system – whose objective is to create a future labour force to keep the money monster alive – and not to teach us to think and give us real skills.

This Flat Earth could be the biggest lie of them all.

Those who think that this will go away soon have a big surprise coming. We have to discard most of NASA’s imagery as part of the LIE – which is one of the first disturbing things everyone finds when entering this realm of research.

My most recent research into the relationship between sound, magnetism and electricity clearly shows that all the physical manifestations of shape and matter and the magnetic fields are the same TOROIDAL shapes that are proposed for the sub-atomic model of the electron AND the magnetic fields of the Earth and even the model of the galaxies that seem to spew forth matter at its galactic equator of the gigantic TORUS shaped galaxy.

My breakthrough discovery is that the evidence suggests that the land or Earth itself follows this DOUBLE TORUS model and the land which we have been told is a ball – is actually the FLAT Accretion disk emerging at the centre of the Earth Torus Magnetic field. All North – South Magnetic alignments and everything else that has been attributed to a ball Earth can be explained even better with a FLAT Earth model.

Like a giant RING Magnet with all the expected magnetic fields around it and inside it. This also accounts for the so-called DOME and hollow Earth theory or Agartha, magnetic drift, precessional wobble, Aurora Borealis, and so many more global mysteries. Everything can be explained by simply re-evaluating the magnetic fields around the Earth and the full shape they hold.

For those that thought the Flat Earth Theory is a bunch of ignorant nonsense devised to confuse humanity and not worthy of debate, have a growing scientific mountain of evidence to deal with. I look forward to seeing how this research evolves.

As so many others have done – I have also done my own experiments with the curvature of the Earth and I found to my surprise that THERE IS NO CURVATURE. No matter how hard I looked. And if there is no curvature, there is only one conclusion we can reach. The Earth surface is flat.

If the weather man can show Chicago from Michigan City some 40 odd miles across Lake Michigan, that should be enough proof that there is no curvature. At that distance Chicago should be about 1060 feet below the horizon. And so the new exiting journey begins – sifting through layers upon layers of deception and lies.

The only thing I have to hold on to is my sanity, sense of humour and an open mind."

In unity and resonance – Michael Tellinger


Next, Some Flat Earth Skullduggery & Intrigue!

What are the ramifications of a "flat earth?" Plenty! Why are world leaders making trips to the Antarctic? I wonder! What does living in a "snow globe" self-contained, domed earth mean regarding ecological issues? It is a fact that there are other area's where mankind can live among the vast regions of Antarctica, but the world's government's strictly control who can go there, and where they can go after arrival. We know the Nazi's were established there, and that a full armada of warships went there to check that out. We know that there will be giants on the earth in the end times, so where are they? I know from personal observation that we possess "anti-gravity" technology, and it is public record that research into developing flying saucers was began in Nazi Germany and has continued in the United States. What secret scientific and military installations exist in Antartica?

A January 22, 2017 article by Greg Hunter in Political Analysis says:

In the last few months, the world’s political and religious leaders have been making trips to the continent at the bottom of the world—Antarctica.

Author of “Empire Beneath the Ice” (second edition December 2016). Steve Quayle says people should take notice. Quayle explains:

“What really is going on down there? Here is the billion dollar question, and probably the trillion dollar question: Why are the world’s religious leaders and the world’s most powerful leaders going to Antarctica? I don’t think the Russian Patriarch Kirill is going down there to meet penguins, with no disrespect meant. Someone or something has summoned the world’s leaders.”

Quayle also says:

“Most people don’t understand, and this is critical, the United States, in 1947, sent a war flotilla to the Antarctic under Admiral Byrd and it was called “Operation Highjump.” It was to seek out and destroy the hidden Nazi bases that intelligence agencies provided them the documentation for. It wasn’t a small thing. There were 13 ships and 4,700 men and state of the art U.S. weaponry. The bad news is we got our rear ends kicked. Russians were spying on us, and they had a video of our aircraft encountering flying saucers.”

Fast forward to today, and Quayle contends:

“Black physics is beyond the PhD level, and we are seeing this with CERN (European Council for Nuclear Research). What is so critical for people to understand is, as more activity takes place at CERN, the occult rituals associated with it are so in your face you can’t dismiss this stuff anymore as being the ranting’s of this fringe or that fringe. Something is happening, and the Antarctic is critical. It’s my contention that because of the advanced technology of the Third Reich . . . that they went under the ice, so to speak, and came into contact with beings, sentient beings that Wernher von Braun and others have made reference to many times before they passed away. So, all this is a matter of record. When you put all the records together, it points to this: There is some entity or group of entities that are thinking and have advanced technology and, basically, give orders to the religious and political leaders of our day.”

The history of the world is not what it is. It is what the powers that be pretend it to be. For the record, all of the world’s leaders never believed that Hitler died in the bunker.

Well, at the heart of all skulduggery and intrigue will be found the influence of Satan. Hitler and the Nazi's were deeply involved in the occult. Hillary Clinton talks to "Eleanor Roosevelt" and Nancy Pelosi sees "dead Suffragettes." The earthly governments are not Godly governments, but are controlled by Satan. Every government on the face of the earth would go completely off the rails, and major in total insanity, except for the continuing presence and influence of the Holy Spirit and the Spirit-led Church.


Blue Ice? Something To Think About!

On February 1, 20127, Jeff Posey posted the following [...but not the two video's within the quote] in Facebook group Flat Earthers In Christ:

I've never really believed in Jesus or done the whole church thing, but I think I've seen the stuff you guys are talking about here. I just didn't know what it was at the time.

I was in the Army from 1997 to 2000, and I was sent to McMurdo Station in Antarctica. I was a helicopter mechanic and crew chief and they had volunteer tours open for guys to go there and work on the helicopters there.

When they asked for volunteers a bunch of us applied but only me and one other guy got accepted. The application process had a bunch of questionnaires that we had to fill out, and we had to sit for a bunch of one on one interviews. It was mostly just a bunch of questions about what our interests and beliefs were.

I was sent to McMurdo research station in August of 1998. When we weren't busy de-icing the aircraft and working on them, we had time to hang out with the scientists at the research station.

The military unit attached to McMurdo was small and we didn't have our own separate facilities. We didn't have a PX, or a media center. There was no chapel or Chaplin. And we didn't have our own separate mail room. We just had to share the same facilities with the scientists and researchers. So over time I got to be friends with a few of them.

They had two different kinds of ice that they worked on and studied. One kind of ice was the normal kind that we've all seen. They took cores of it out of bore holes in the ground. Just like normal ice it was mostly clear or sometimes white, and it would melt into liquid water if it got warm. The whole area of Antarctica is covered in this kind of ice. But that wasn't their main kind of ice. The only time I ever saw them actually studying normal ice was when a film crew from National Geographic came by.

The rest of the time, which was most of the time, the scientists were studying something they called sky ice.

This stuff was totally different.

We were never allowed to go into the laboratory areas of the station, because the labs had to be kept super clean and they said it would mess up their work if they risked letting too many people in the lab. But one time one of the researchers that I was friends with showed me a piece of sky ice. You couldn't touch the stuff with your bare hands because it was so cold.

And it wasn't clear or white like normal ice. It was solid blue. He said that's why they call it sky ice, because it was the exact same color as the sky.

We had to wear our thick heavy "going outside" gloves to handle it. The stuff was so cold it would instantly freeze your skin if you touched it. I don't remember what temperature he said it was. But it was something like hundreds of degrees below zero. WAY colder than the normal ice that was outside.

He had to carry it in a metal bottle that was kinda like a thermos. He let me play with a piece of it for a while. It felt lighter than a piece of normal ice of the same size, like it wasn't very heavy at all. It almost felt like you could throw it up in the air and it would just float back down, but I didn't try that. And it was also a little flexible when I tried to bend it. It didn't break like normal ice would. And even for a small piece, you couldn't see through it. It was solid blue right from the surface.

And here's the really weird part. It didn't melt into water. When it got warm, because we had it inside, it just started to shrink. It got smaller and smaller, but my glove never got wet. And there was no water on the floor. The stuff just turned into thin air when it got warm, and vaporized.

He said that was the reason why they had to study the stuff right there in Antarctica. You couldn't take sky ice back to America to study it, because it was almost impossible to keep it cold enough during transit. It would always vaporize into air and you'd have nothing left when you got back to the US. He said Russian scientists had discovered the same problem when they tried to take sky ice back to Russia. So that was why they all had research stations in Antarctica.

After maybe 15 minutes of handling the piece of sky ice, it was almost completely gone. Just a tiny little bit was left. And my glove was dry the whole time.

I'd never seen anything like it before or since. And that's unusual because I've always had an interest in scientific things. I think that's even why I got selected to go to Antarctica, because a big part of the interview was about science and what I believed about things. So I really thought it was cool to see something I'd never heard of before.

The whole time I was at McMurdo I heard people talk about "the wall" like that was a special place. It's pretty common to find ice walls and ice cliffs all over Antarctica. The whole place is ice. But it's all just normal white or clear ice, so I asked my friend where they get the sky ice from, and he said it comes from "the wall".

I don't remember exactly how he described it, but apparently there's a huge wall of sky ice in Antarctica. He said it was hundreds of miles inland from the coast. I never got to see it myself because I was only stationed to McMurdo. I didn't get to go out on expeditions. He said it was the biggest natural structure in the world.

He said that in the 1960's the US Army had a plan to bore a tunnel into the wall. But they didn't have a boring machine that could handle super cold temperatures. So they had a whole testing project in Greenland where they developed ice tunnels and invented new boring machines that could operate in super cold temperatures. Like they did this whole big thing in Greenland just for practice. I'm not an expert on that but that's just what he told me. Then once they had the new boring machine figured out, they brought it to the wall in Antarctica.

He said that the machine bored a tunnel, I don't remember exactly, like 5 or 10 miles into the wall, but that they never broke through the other side of the wall, and that they still don't know how thick the wall is even to this day.

And I'm probably not remembering this part correctly, but I think he said that at first, the floor of the tunnel was solid rock, but after a mile or two in, the floor was sky ice. Like it was sky ice underneath after a certain point. Or something like that.

And apparently the wall slowly builds itself back up after you cut it, because after a year or so, the tunnel had shrunk smaller all by itself. They had to leave the boring machine inside the wall because the tunnel shrunk too small to get it back out. And after a few decades the tunnel was completely gone.

Like, that part of the wall was solid again.

He said that now the scientists were trying to use technology to figure out how thick the wall is. He said something about putting earthquake sensors all along the wall, and that somehow you could measure the signal from an earthquake to see how thick the wall is, but he kinda lost me on that part.

I never really thought about any of that after I left. It was really weird stuff, but I didn't think it was a big deal at the time. But then a few weeks ago I saw a map of the wall in Antarctica. Except the map was all flat and crazy looking, and it showed the wall going all the way up over the whole earth.

So since then I've been trying to learn more about the sky ice that I saw, and the wall that I heard about, but I can't find anything at all. So now I'm really wondering if there could be a connection here. And that's how I found this group. So I hope that maybe some part of my experience will help someone figure something out.

I don't know if that report is fact or fiction, but it wouldn't surprise me if it is factual. Water certainly does have some unusual qualities that we are still researching, like the super dense, super salty water found deep in the Antarctic Ocean. It is called "dense water" or a "brine pool."

I have no doubt that where the firmament meets the ground has been found long ago. And they certainly have found something there that has persuaded the powers-that-be to keep the Antarctic off limits to the general public. What is it? What have they discovered? Perhaps the throne of Satan himself at an entrance to the underworld? I must confess that I sometimes wonder if the supposed hole into a hollow earth at the north pole has really been found, and that in truth it is the edge of the Bottomless Pit that is mentioned in Holy Scripture. What I have no doubt about is that the surface of the earth is flat rather than on a globe!


Flat Earth Book & Study Resources

Biblical Cosmography

The Dauntless Astronomy

Zetetic Astronomy Earth Not a Globe (1865) by Samuel "Parallax" Rowbothan

Experimental Proofs That The Surface Of Standing Water Is Not Convex But Horizontal (1870) by Samuel "Parallax" Rowbothan

Earth Not A Globe (1881) by Samuel Birley Rowbotham

One Hundred Proofs That The Earth Is Not A Globe (1885) by William Carpenter

One Hundred Proofs That The Earth Is Not A Globe (1885) by William Carpenter

Zetetic Cosmogeny (1899) by Samuel "Parallax" Rowbothan

Terra Firma: The Earth Not A Planet, Proved From Scripture, Reason And Fact (1901) by David Wardlaw Scott

The Earth A Plane (1906) by John Edward Qunlan

The Enlightenment Of The World (1912) by John G. Abizaid

The Flat Earth Society (Facebook)

The Atlantean Conspiracy by Eric Dubay *

The Flat Earth Conspiracy (2014) by Eric Dubay *

     * (Note: Dubay is a New Ager, not a Christian, and uses offensive language.)


Omar Thibeaux Flat Earth Series


Flat Earth Media Resources


Hello Flat Earth: NASA Lies (Adele Cover Song by Amber Plaster)


Time To Unite: Wayki Wayki – Flat Earth And Other Lands


wakiwaki Flat Earth


What Happens When You Become A Flat Earther?


Biblical Flat Earth: Exposing the Idolatry of Man's Natural Philosophy

Here is illustrated the atrocity of combining secular pseudo-science with Biblical knowledge. The secular pseudo-science globe earth cosmology is not compatible with the biblical flat earth cosmology. This is, sadly, also illustrative of the average brainwashed preacher of today. I have examined politics, religion and science. You must choose between Jesus Christ or Satan!

Biblical Flat Earth Exposes the Idolatry Of Natural Philosophy


The Solar System Is A Construct Of Kabbalah